We buildproducts peopletruly love.

We offer web application development, mobile app development, backend and API development, UI/UX design, MVP development and corporate website development.

We run projects end to end, from idea to launch: discovery, data model and architecture, interface design, development sprints, testing and release. Because the same team is present at every stage, nothing is lost in handover between design and engineering.

Some clients come to us for a single piece — building an existing design, or redesigning an existing product. We can also extend your current team.

An MVP with a single verifiable flow typically ships in 4-6 weeks. We took DrapeAI's AI-powered virtual try-on app to the store in that window.

We work in 1-2 week sprint cycles, and every sprint ends with a working build you can install on a test device. You see progress through the product itself, not through a status report.

That time is won by narrowing scope, not by adding people. In the first meeting we write down everything that stays out of the MVP — the most practical tool against silent scope growth. For projects with multiple main flows, 8-12 weeks is realistic.

We reply to every request from the contact form within 12 hours.

Our first reply usually contains a few clarifying questions: what problem the project should solve, which platforms you are targeting, and what systems already exist. We then schedule a short discovery call.

By the end of that call, scope, a realistic timeline estimate and a budget range are settled. Nothing is charged up to this point.

The main driver of cost is not screen count but the number of integrations and the complexity of user roles. Every external system the app connects to — payments, ERP, shipping, maps — is a separate development and testing item.

Beyond that, the number of target platforms, offline requirements, real-time features and whether design is built from scratch all move the budget directly.

After a short discovery call we offer two models: a fixed-scope quote for well-defined projects, and a sprint-based engagement where scope will evolve. We publish typical budget ranges by project type as a table in our blog.

React, Next.js, TypeScript and Tailwind CSS on the frontend; Flutter and Dart on mobile; .NET, C#, Python and PostgreSQL on the backend.

We choose per project. If content needs to be discoverable in search, we use static generation or server-side rendering; for a dashboard used after login, client-side rendering is enough. On mobile we prefer Flutter for interface and logic-driven apps, and evaluate native where deep hardware access is required.

We use TypeScript without exception. Type safety pays off not in month one but as the codebase grows, and it is the single most practical decision for lowering maintenance cost.

Yes. We offer ongoing support agreements covering bug fixes, performance improvements, new feature development and infrastructure maintenance.

A common approach is to budget 15-20% of development cost per year for maintenance. That covers both library updates and changes in app store requirements.

A support agreement is not mandatory. Because all source code stays in your repository and architecture documentation is handed over, you can continue the project with your own team or another one.